service genset jogja
Genesis 5:7-8

It’s Not Our Accomplishments

The Genealogies of Genesis chapter five lists ten men. They all lived incredibly long lives.  Leupold argues, “There is no reason for doubting the correctness of the chronology submitted by the Hebrew Masoretic text. This is intended to be a complete chronology, complete as far as marking the actual lapse of time is concerned. No other nation has anything to compare with it. Yet, strange to say, the only reliable chronology which we have, which purports to be a good chronology dating back to Creation, is continually being questioned, corrected, amended, and condemned in favor of fallible documents which are historically but poorly attested and marked by many a gap. The claim that the Scriptures do not give a complete and accurate chronology for the whole period of the Old Testament that they cover is utterly wrong, dangerous and mischievous. At the slightest objection, men are ready to cast aside as inadequate the only adequate chronology mankind possesses.”[1]

The attacks on these genealogies and other subjects mentioned in the early chapters of Genesis are all based on man’s ability and reason to work out things for himself. It’s very reminiscent of the spirit and intent of those in the genealogy of chapter four, the genealogy of Cain. It speaks about all the wonderful deeds of his descendants: One built cities, another made weapons, and still, another advanced in the production of music and musical instruments. Cain’s genealogy ends with Lamech, who committed what seems to be a double homicide and introduced bigamy into the world. In Genesis 5:7-8, we read of the second line of descendants from Adam, the line of Seth. It says, “Seth lived after he fathered Enosh 807 years and had other sons and daughters. Thus all the days of Seth were 912 years, and he died.”

We don’t have any record of outstanding accomplishments except that they “called out in the name of the Lord.” And as the line of Cain, the murderer, led to more murder, the line of Seth led to more Faith in God. The writer of Hebrews tells us that Enoch walked with God by “faith.” I agree with Augustine that it’s most likely that accomplishments were achieved and cities were built. Louth quotes from Augustine’s “City of God” and suggests we “…Notice that when the inspired writer sets forth the length of the lives of the men he mentions, the narrative always ends with the formula, ‘and he begot sons and daughters, and all the time that so and so lived were so many years, and he died.’ Considering that these sons and daughters are not named and remembering how long people lived in that first period of our history, can anyone refuse to believe that so great a multitude of men was born to have been able, in groups, to build a great number of cities?”[2] Yet, what mattered to those in Seth’s line, was their walk with God, not their outstanding accomplishments. It’s not what we do; it’s what God has done for us that matters.

[1] Leupold, H. C. 1942. Exposition of Genesis. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.

[2] Louth, Andrew, and Marco Conti, eds. 2001. Genesis 1–11. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Genesis 5:6

The Hope of Salvation

Genesis 5:6 introduces us to Enosh, Seth’s first son. It says, “When Seth had lived 105 years, he fathered Enosh. Seth lived after he fathered Enosh 807 years and had other sons and daughters.” From Seth to Noah, the rest of the generations tell us how old the man was when the next one was born and how long he lived after the son was born. I realize that the Septuagint (Greek Translation of the Old Testament) and the Samaritan Pentateuch present us with different years for Enosh and the following descendants. I’m trusting the Original Hebrew as reflected in the Masoretic Text, as did most of our English translators. For a thorough discussion on this subject, see Larsson’s article.[1] The Lexham Research Commentary summarizes his conclusion for us. It says, “Larsson argues that numbers in the Masoretic Text are original. He shows how the Septuagint and Samaritan Pentateuch altered these original numbers.”[2]

Trusting the Hebrew Masoretic Text to be the original and inspired text, Butler makes some interesting observations. He writes, “Adam died at 930 years. Seth at 912, Enos at 905, Cainan at 910, Mahalaleel at 895 (the first in the list to die under 900), Jared at 962, Enoch did not die but lived only 365 years on the earth before his supernatural departure, Methuselah died at 969 years (which is the longest any human lived), Lamech died at 777 (the youngest in age at death in this obituary). The years of their death indicate that Noah was born 126 years after Adam’s death. Lamech died five years before his father, Methuselah. Methuselah was 243 years old when Adam died. Enoch was translated just 57 years after Adam died and before any of the rest of the men on the list died. All of the nine men listed in the obituary were born before Adam died.” Then he adds, “The obituary goes from Adam to Noah, and significantly Noah spoke with Lamech, his father, who could have spoken with Adam (for Lamech was 56 when Adam died). Furthermore, Noah could have spoken to Abraham (for Abraham was 58 when Noah died). Any tradition, information, etc., that needed to be passed down only required four people in all the years from Adam to Abraham. God protects His revelation!”[3]

As Calvin points out, “Through six successive generations when the family of Seth had grown into a great people, the voice of Adam daily resounded to remind them about the creation, the Fall, man’s punishment, and the hope of salvation.”[4]

[1] Larsson, Gerhard. 1983. “The Chronology of the Pentateuch: A Comparison of the Mt and LXX.” Journal of Biblical Literature 102: 401.

[2] Mangum, Douglas, Miles Custis, and Wendy Widder. 2012. Genesis 1–11. Lexham Research Commentaries. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.

[3] Butler, John G. 2008. Analytical Bible Expositor: Genesis. Clinton, IA: LBC Publications.

[4] Calvin, John. 2001. Genesis. Crossway Classic Commentaries. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

Genesis 5:4, Hebrews 2:10

Other Sons and Daughters

We only know three of the children of Adam and Eve by name: Cain, Abel, and Seth. But there were others. Adam lived a total of 930 years, and verse 4 tells us, “The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters.” When Cain was cast out of the presence of God and his family he was afraid that some might want to take vengeance on him for the murder of Abel. You might wonder who he worried about. This verse gives us the answer. I’m sure that over a period of 800 years and in good health Adam and Eve could have had many children, grandchildren, and even great-grandchildren. Cain obviously took a wife from amongst these, but there were many others that might have desired to get even with Cain. Utley observes, “Cain feared for his own life. The rabbis say that he was afraid of the animals. However, the context seems to imply that his own relatives, who would be ‘go’els’ (blood avenger) for Abel, would kill him. This would imply that Adam and Eve had many unnamed children.”

There have been many wild speculations concerning Cain’s wife. It appears that Cain was already married at the time of his crime against Abel and he took his family with him when he was expelled to the land of Nod. But that too is speculation. There has even been the suggestion of other non-Homosapien humanoids at the time from which Cain took a wife. Utley finishes his comments on this by saying, “There is a very interesting discussion of Adam and Eve’s relationship to other pre-historic humanoids in Kidner’s The Tyndale Commentary on Genesis and Bernard Ramm’s discussion of anthropology in The Christian’s View of Science and Scripture. This verse implies many other rational creatures. For a discussion of humanoids and their dates of occupation of the ancient Near East see R. K. Harrison’s Introduction to the Old Testament, pp. 147–163 and Who was Adam? by Fazale Rana and Hugh Ross. If Cain married a non-Homosapien without God’s Spirit, then Gen. 6:1–4 would be a mixing of God’s special human creation with bipedal animals instead of humans with angels.”[1]

As Genesis five continues with the genealogy of Seth leading to Noah, the phrase “he had many other sons and daughters” is repeated nine times, once after each of the descendants. The writer of Hebrews, being well versed in the teaching of the Old Testament, very likely had the refrain of “many sons and daughters” in mind when he spoke about how “Jesus Christ has been made complete through his exaltation in a manner that anticipates God bringing many other sons and daughters to glory” in Hebrews 2:10. The many other sons and daughters in Seth’s line are all to be brought to death, but those in the line of Christ are brought to glory and eternal life with Christ.

[1] Utley, Robert James. 2001. How It All Began: Genesis 1–11. Vol. Vol. 1A. Study Guide Commentary Series. Marshall, Texas: Bible Lessons International.

Genesis 5:4

Quality of Life

In Genesis 5:4, we’re introduced to the long life-spans of the ante-diluvian characters. It tells us, “The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters.” He was 130 years old when Seth was born, making Adam 930 years old at his death. Some that will follow in the genealogy will even live longer than Adam. Methuselah lived to be nearly 1000 years old. One of Carasik’s ancient Jewish commentators says, “It is unclear whether all the children lived these unusually long lives, or whether this applied only to the named ones, who did not pursue the bodily appetites that shorten one’s life. Maimonides certainly thought so.”[1] He was a 12th century “Jewish scholar, physician, and philosopher, the most influential Jewish thinker of the Middle Ages.”[2]

Who am I to argue with one of the most influential Jewish thinkers? Yet, there are other records of people who lived during this time who lived long lives. Matthews writes, “Although there is no satisfactory explanation of the long life spans before the flood, there are Sumerian lists of kings who purportedly reigned before the flood with reigns as long as 43,200 years. The Sumerians used the sexagesimal number system (a combination of base six and base ten), and when the numbers of the Sumerian king list are converted to decimal, they are very much in the range of the age spans of the preflood genealogies of Genesis. The Hebrews, like most other Semitic peoples, used a base-ten decimal system as far back as writing extends.”[3] Most modern conservative commentators attribute the long life to the climate conditions that existed before the flood. Afterward, the canopy that protected man from the aging rays of the sun was gone and the lifespan of man was reduced.

Exell argues that it isn’t the length of one’s life that is important but the content. He says, “We cannot measure a man’s life by the number of years he has passed in the burden and battle of the world. A long life may be lived in a very short space of time, and a number of years may be the chronicle of a brief life. Man’s truest life is spent in and measured by deeds, thoughts, sympathies, and heroic activities. A man may live a long life in one day. He has been instrumental in the salvation of one soul; then, in that day, he has lived a short eternity. A man who writes in a year a thoughtful book, which shall instruct and culture the minds of men, lives a century in that brief space of time. The schoolmaster who teaches a boy to think, the minister who helps men to be pure and sound, the gentle spirits who aid by visitation and prayer the sorrowful and the sick, are the world’s most extended lives; these are the world’s true Methuselahs.”[4]

[1] Carasik, Michael, ed. 2018. Genesis: Introduction and Commentary. Translated by Michael Carasik. The Commentators’ Bible. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.

[2] Lagassé, Paul, Columbia University. 2000. In The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed. New York; Detroit: Columbia University Press; Sold and distributed by Gale Group.

[3] Matthews, Victor Harold, Mark W. Chavalas, and John H. Walton. 2000. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament. Electronic ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

[4] Exell, Joseph S., and Thomas H. Leale. 1892. Genesis. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary. New York; London; Toronto: Funk & Wagnalls Company.

Genesis 5:3, Romans 5:18-19

The Image and Likeness of Adam

Interestingly, Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters, but only three of the sons are mentioned by name in the Bible. Cain was the firstborn, and he murdered his little brother Abel. We don’t know how old Adam was when either of them was born, but we do know how old he was when Seth was born. Genesis 5:3 says, “When Adam had lived 130 years, he fathered a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth.”

Adam was created in both the “likeness” and “image” of God as was recorded previously in Genesis. This was how God created him and placed him in the Garden of Eden with his wife Eve. But when he chose to eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, either the likeness or the image was permanently marred, and that marred “likeness” was transmitted to all generations that followed. Sarna observed, “What constituted ‘the image of God’ in the first two human beings was transmitted through procreation to all future generations.”[1] All human life is sacred and is created in the “image” of God. But, since all human life proceeds from Adam, the marred “likeness” or “sinfulness” of Adam has been passed on to all humanity as well. Thus, Paul teaches us that “in Adam, we all sinned.” But Christ was born of a virgin. He was not conceived in the “likeness” of Adam but by the Holy Spirit and did not inherit original sin. Augustine argued that the virgin birth broke the bond of “sexually transmitted original sin.”[2]

Guzik makes this relevant to you and me. He writes, “Even as Seth was in Adam’s fallen image and likeness, so also is every one of us. We are all sons and daughters of Adam, born fallen even as Adam was fallen. It would be redundant to say it, but every other person has been born in Adam’s image and likeness except Jesus.”[3] This is why Paul gives us all hope in Romans. Paul explains our plight regarding original sin by explaining the role of the second Adam, Jesus. In Romans 5:18-19, Paul writes, “Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience, the many will be made righteous.” It’s no wonder Paul is “not ashamed of the Gospel.” It is the power of God for salvation for all who believe!

[1] Sarna, Nahum M. 1989. Genesis. The JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.

[2] Ferguson, Sinclair B., and J.I. Packer. 2000. In New Dictionary of Theology, electronic ed., 643. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

[3] Guzik, David. 2013. Genesis. David Guzik’s Commentaries on the Bible. Santa Barbara, CA: David Guzik.

Genesis 5:2, Leviticus 19:18

Brothers and Sisters All!

Genesis 5:2 tells us that our species received its name directly from God. Adam named the animals and his wife Eve. But as a species, as the couple to populate the entire earth, God named the pair with one name. The verse says, “Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created.” It’s a bit confusing because the same word refers to a single man and becomes his personal name. But the use of the word is broader at times. Grudem observes, “God gave the human race a name that, like the English word man, can either mean a male human being or refer to the human race in general.”[1] Carasik goes further by saying, “They were created to be human, not animals. The female too is ‘Man’ in this generic sense, which of course was applied to both sexes.”

ar that children are a blessing from God. But they can also be a curse, as with Cain and his lineage. He becomes nothing more than an animal when one lives a fleshly life, with his belly crawling along the ground like the serpent of Genesis Chapter three. And all the fleshly appetites direct his every action and attitude. But God also created mankind in his own image and likeness, and there is a higher aspect to humanity. Carasik goes on to say, “Naming them in this way distinguished them from all the other creatures. Humans, though their bodies are made of earth—the adamah that gives them their name—have a higher soul. One who is drawn after the earthly side of his nature forfeits, as it were, his higher dimension. Just this was true of Cain and his descendants, another reason they are not mentioned here.”[2]

All humanity comes from the original couple, Adam and Eve. Although I think the current thought amongst some scientists got some of the details wrong, they seem to endorse this view. One website says, “The myth that Adam and Eve were the first man and women on Earth may have been proved true — as all humans are descendants of a single couple, scientists say. Scientists have said that we sprang from a solitary pair of adults — who lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago — after a catastrophic event almost wiped out the entire human race. The findings were made by scientists who surveyed the genetic ‘bar codes’ of five million animals — including humans — from 100,000 different species.”[3] The ancient Rabbis who took all this from the biblical record also believed that it’s the basis for the Golden Rule found in Leviticus 19:18, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Sarna says, “By tracing all humanity back to a common parentage, this phrase conveys the idea that the ‘Golden Rule’ is logically indefensible without the presupposition of the absolute unity and equality of the human race as created by God.”[4]

[1] Grudem, Wayne. 2002. “The Key Issues in the Manhood-Womanhood Controversy, and the Way Forward.” In Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood, edited by Wayne A. Grudem, 30. Foundations for the Family Series. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

[2] Carasik, Michael, ed. 2018. Genesis: Introduction and Commentary. Translated by Michael Carasik. The Commentators’ Bible. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.

[3] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/all-of-mankind-may-have-actually-descended-from-a-single-couple/articleshow/66823465.cms

[4] Sarna, Nahum M. 1989. Genesis. The JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.

Genesis 5:2, Psalms 127:3-5

A Blessing or a Curse

Genesis 5:1 reminds us that human life is sacred to God. We are all created in the image and likeness of God, and the miracle is naturally transmitted to all humans at conception. Every human being is a miracle. In the next verse, God reminds his readers that at creation, “Male and female, he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created.” The blessing refers back to Genesis 1:28, which recorded the details of God’s blessing on the man and the woman. It says, “And God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.’” The blessing also looks forward to the rest of chapter five, which records the children in the line of Adam and Eve from their son Seth. The Bible is full of pronouncements of the blessing of God involving children. In Psalm 127:3-5, the Psalmist sings, “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.  Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one’s youth. Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them!”

That children are a blessing is a specific theme in the Bible. An article in the Ashland Theological Journal explains, “The Old Testament affirms the biological family, which is assumed to be the basic unit of society. Israelite society was structured along kinship lines. Much of Old Testament law regulates and protects family life. But more than this basic affirmation and pragmatic regulation, the family is regarded as a source of divine blessing. This perspective begins in Genesis when God creates and blesses the first family and gives them the command to be fruitful and multiply. Children are a blessing from the Lord.”[1] But God doesn’t always bless couples with children. Does that mean they are cursed? Not at all! The Feinberg brothers correctly argue, “While children are a blessing from the Lord, it may be his will for some not to have them. It is no embarrassment or disgrace for a couple to remain childless.”[2]

Chapter five continues to recount the blessing that came to Adam and Eve through Seth, Abel’s replacement. Chapter four of Genesis gave us the line from Cain, which was anything but a blessing to Adam and Eve and served to be the source of God’s destruction of all humanity through the flood. Whereas a godly offspring is indeed a wonderful blessing, an ungodly offspring brings much sorrow. Van Gemeren observed this truth and the ancient Jewish teachings regarding it. He writes, “Sirach holds that a single child who performs the Lord’s will is better than a thousand who do not (v. 3). An analogy follows: ‘For through one intelligent person a city can be filled with people, but through a clan of outlaws it becomes desolate.’ Character comes before quantity; better to die childless than have wicked children—regardless of how many.”[3]

[1] Colijn, Brenda B. 2004. “Family in the Bible: A Brief Survey.” Ashland Theological Journal Volume 36 36: 73–74.

[2] Feinberg, John S., and Paul D. Feinberg. 1993. Ethics for a Brave New World. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

[3] VanGemeren, Willem, ed. 1997. In New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis, 3:677. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.

Genesis 5:2, Isaiah 5:20

Woe to those…

Genesis 5:1 reminds us that human life is sacred to God. We are all created in the image and likeness of God, and the miracle is naturally transmitted to all humans at conception. Every human being is a miracle. In the next verse, God reminds his readers that at creation, “Male and female, he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created.” The most obvious observation is that God’s image is shared equally by women and men. God made both man and woman in his image. Neither man nor woman is made more in the image of God than the other. The Bible places both man and woman at the pinnacle of God’s creation from the beginning. Neither sex is exalted, and neither is depreciated.

It’s such a disappointment to find ourselves in a world where this simple, obvious truth, that God created us as “Male and Female,” needs to be defended. “The Bible has plenty to say about human sexuality. Most basic to our understanding of sex is that God created two (and only two) genders. All the modern-day speculation about numerous genders—or even a gender ‘continuum’ with unlimited genders—is unbiblical. No matter if the gender distortion has a genetic, hormonal, physiological, or psychological cause, the Bible clearly and consistently labels any sexual activity outside of marriage or not between a man and a woman as sin, rebellion against God’s plan.”[1] But to hold this view is to be anathema in our culture. You are called names, ridiculed as homophobe bigots, and excluded from the mainstream of society in many ways. My, how things have changed in just 50 years. It’s not the homosexual who is shamed! It is the Bible believer.

Here is a recent Washington Post Headline: “TIME magazine honors transgender celebrity as one of its Women of the Year.” The article goes on to say, “The honor comes with tensions rising over transgender women taking honors and titles designated for biological women as the transgender-rights movement flexes its considerable clout in politics, sports and entertainment. Others include collegiate athlete Lia Thomas, who has smashed women’s swimming records, and ‘Jeopardy!’ champion Amy Schneider, who was hailed by media outlets as the show’s winningest female contestant. Both were born male and transitioned as adults to female.” Isaiah 5:20 says, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”

 

[1] Got Questions Ministries. 2002–2013. Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

sewa motor jogja
© Chuck Larsen 2019. Powered by WordPress.