service genset jogja
2 Corinthians 1:4

What Goes Around…

Paul continues to talk about God as the Father of mercies and the mother who comforts her hurting children but adds a purpose to God’s mercy and comfort.  The Father of Jesus Christ is the God who shows mercy and “who comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God.” Forgiveness, mercy is needed because of our sinfulness. Comfort is needed because we live in a world that is full of suffering. God desires that we pass on the forgiveness, mercy, that we receive and comfort that we receive from God. By any estimation, 2 Corinthians 1:3–7 frames the Bible’s greatest text on comfort. The word “comfort” occurs no less than ten times in its noun and verb forms in this brief paragraph—essentially one-third of all thirty-one occurrences in the New Testament. Paul says more about suffering, and more about comfort, than any other writer in the Bible. And it is here that he says the most about it. Thinking about Paul’s life that might be expected. He was whipped, stoned, imprisoned, and eventually beheaded by Nero. But his whole life was one of suffering and comforting others who suffer. Hughes argues, “There is a reason for this, and it was to answer critics who held that the sufferings that characterized Paul’s life were evidence that he was not an apostle, because if he was the real thing, he wouldn’t be experiencing so much trouble. Paul’s answer was that abundant suffering and abundant comfort are, in fact signs of apostolic authenticity.”[1]

Dietrich Bonhoeffer is a more modern person who suffered greatly and passed on the comfort he received to others. He “was one of a handful of German theologians to stand up to the Nazification of the German church. Bonhoeffer’s courage thrust him into the leadership of the Confessing Church along with other stalwarts like Martin Niemöller. Bonhoeffer went so far as to found an underground seminary in Finkenwald, Bavaria, which was closed by Gestapo chief Heinrich Himmler. This led to Bonhoeffer’s joining the resistance movement and his being imprisoned by the Gestapo in April 1943. Bonhoeffer’s Letters from Prison became a best-seller after the war. Among the letters is a beautiful poem written to his fiancé Maria von Wedemeyer entitled ‘New Year 1945.’ Stanza 3 is famous:

Should it be ours to drain the cup of grieving

Even to the dregs of pain,

At thy command, we will not falter,

Thankfully receiving all that is given

By thy loving hand.1

“Poignant words that became more so when, three months later, just as the war was ending, Bonhoeffer was hung in Flossenbürg prison. Fast-forward to some eighteen years later, across the Atlantic in America, when another bride-to-be was grieving the death of her fiancé and found much comfort in Bonhoeffer’s poem. Her fiancé, who died from injuries in a sledding accident, was the son of author Joseph Bayly and his wife Mary Lou. When she mailed Bonhoeffer’s poem to them, Joe and Mary Lou also found comfort in ‘New Year 1945.’ Twelve years after this (thirty years after Bonhoeffer’s death), Joe Bayly received a letter from a pastor-friend in Massachusetts relating that he had visited a terminally ill woman in a Boston hospital for some period of time and had given her Joe’s book of poems, Heaven, as comfort for her soul. The pastor said that the dying woman had stayed awake late the previous night to read it and told him of the comfort and help she had received from it. A few hours later she died. The woman, the pastor revealed, was Maria von Wedemeyer-Weller, Bonhoeffer’s fiancé three decades earlier! God’s comfort circulates among his children—and sometimes it comes full circle, as it did from Dietrich Bonhoeffer to Maria von Wedemeyer in her grief to Joseph Bayly, Jr.’s grieving fiancé to Joe and Mary Lou Bayly in their grief and then back to Bonhoeffer’s one-time fiancé as comfort in her dying hours.2 Our text alludes to this astonishing cyclical nature of comfort—its mutuality—its overflowing nature.”

[1] Hughes, R. Kent. 2006. 2 Corinthians: Power in Weakness. Preaching the Word. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

1 Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, ed. Eberhard Bethge (New York: Macmillan, 1953), p. 221.

2 Personal correspondence of Joseph Bayly, June 23, 1980.

1 Corinthians 1:4-5, 4:7

The Problem With Self-made People

After greeting his readers with a prayer for grace and peace to be theirs from God and Jesus, he then continues explaining how he prays for his readers in Corinth. 1 Corinthians 1:4-5 says, “I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus, that in every way you were enriched in him in all speech and all knowledge.” Paul’s prayers always seem to begin with “thanks.” As he begins his prayer in this section, he says, “I give thanks to my God always.” I remember my mother saying “thank God!” a lot of times. When Dad would finally do something she asked him to do, she would say it. When the turkey came out of the oven on time, she would say it. When I would get a passing grade on my report card, she would say it. My mom was a lot like Paul. She would thank God for most things in life. She would also say, “thank goodness.” Sometimes it would be “thank heaven.” One online dictionary comments on the saying and says that the “thank God” phrase means, “I’m grateful, as in Thank God you arrived safely, or We didn’t, thank goodness, run out of food, or Thank heaven the book arrived on time. These ejaculations originally expressed gratitude to divine providence but today tend to be used in a more casual way.”[1]

Paul sounds a lot more sincere with his thanksgiving to God than my mom did. He specifically points out what he’s thankful for regarding the Corinthians. First, he’s thankful for the Grace God gave them. It appears to be agreed that Grace, by definition, is undeserved favor. It’s not earned by being good or doing good deeds. It is simply a gift. One writer said, “At Christmas time, we all give and receive gifts, but in most all cases, these gifts are not deserved. (Except in the case of Santa Claus, so you better watch out!). The gifts are given, but they are of no value unless they are received (opened) and put to use in our lives. So if God’s grace is a gift, your only action is to be open to receive His gift.”[2] This is especially true regarding salvation itself. It is impossible to be earned or deserved. When can only accept the generous offer of salvation like one receives a Christmas gift. Jesus, of course, is the greatest Christmas gift. Paul tells us that we are saved by “grace.” It’s a gift from God. All of our service to God is done by His grace. All of our acts of kindness are done by His grace. Paul is not only talking about the grace of salvation that the Corinthians had received. He’s specifically pointing out how God had gifted them personally. He thanks God for their enrichment in speech and knowledge.

Paul begins by complementing the Corinthians for all their giftedness in speaking and knowledge. The Corinthians had become known for having many of the spiritual gifts of ministry. He wants them to know that he respects their giftedness to set the stage for what’s coming. There’s going to be a big “but” in the course of this letter. But for now, he wants the Corinthians to know he recognizes their giftedness. But he wants them to know from the outset that these gifts are somehow reflective of their being any better than anyone else. They are “underserved,” as are all gifts from God. Paul will get quite specific about this later in the letter. In 1 Corinthians 4:7, he writes, “What do you have that you did not receive? If you received it, why do you boast that you did not receive it?” We talk a lot about being “self-made.” We are taught that we should lift ourselves up by our own bootstraps. We honor and lift these people up as examples for us to follow. But “The problem with some self-made people is that they end up worshipping themselves. They may think, ‘Wait a minute; I built this business with my bare hands.’ But who gave you your hands? They say, ‘I thought up the business plan totally by myself.’ But who gave you your mind? They claim, ‘I worked for where I am today by the sweat of my brow.’ But who gave you the ability to work so hard?”[3] When I pray over our food with my grandsons around, I say the same thing every time because I want them to understand where Grampa stands. I say, “Dear Lord, you have filled the world with color and have given us eyes. You have filled the world with music and given us ears. You have filled the world with good things to eat and given us the ability to enjoy them. So, Bless us, O Lord, and these thy gifts that we are about to receive through Christ Jesus, Our Lord.”

[1] https://www.dictionary.com/browse/thank–god

[2] https://www.radianceworship.org/blog/grace-is-a-gift

[3] https://pastorrick.com/what-do-you-have-that-god-hasnt-given-you/

Romans 1:5-6, Various

Sick To My Stomach

God declared Jesus as Lord through the resurrection from the dead. It’s Jesus’ resurrection that set the Church on its course through history. Without the resurrection, there would be no church. The disciples would have gone back to fishing. The grieving women would have embalmed Jesus’ body, and the disciples would have continued on their way to Emmaus. Jesus would have been just another radical Jewish religious figure from the past whose teachings and actions revealed the demented character of a false messiah. But the resurrection proved that Jesus was whom he said He was, and that sent the disciples into action. Paul wants the Romans to know that the resurrected Christ has commissioned him and his partners to bring the truth to the world, including them. Just as at the ascension, Jesus left His disciples with the commission to spread the good news around the world before He left them. Yet, He appeared once again to a Pharisee who was persecuting the church. Paul clearly saw the commission that Jesus gave His disciples as his own mission. In Romans 1:5-6, he says, “Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations, including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ.”

 Along with all of the previous disciples, Paul claims to have received “grace and apostleship.” When we consider the various calls of Christ on His disciples to share the good news with the world, it seems Paul is referring to the great commission. The great commission appears in Matthew 28:16-20; Mark 16:15–18; Luke 24:44-49; John 20:19-23; and Acts 1:8. It has been a fairly universal understanding that this call to share the good news of God’s grace is applicable to all believers. Paul uses the first person plural “we.” Many commentators think he’s referring to just himself and the other apostles. Some think he was using the plural as a general way of just speaking about himself. It’s a rhetorical “we” in that case. But I’m thinking from the overall commissioning of Jesus’ disciples to the task of sharing their faith with the world, Paul is using it as a “we” that includes his Roman readers in that mission. Most protestant interpreters of the great commission apply Jesus’ calling to the whole church, past, present, and future. The word for “apostle” doesn’t always have to be a technical term that refers to only a select few during Jesus’ day. It could just mean “sent ones,” as the Greek term literally means. Paul speaks of receiving “grace” as well as apostleship. I doubt if anyone would argue that “grace” is only given to the few. There is a sense in which “grace and apostleship” are given to all believers.

Paul brings his readers into the mission as coworkers in bringing about the “obedience of faith” to everyone in every generation. There are numerous preachers and commentators that try to separate “obedience” from “faith.” They argue that Paul is calling Christians to be obedient to the law of Moses or at least to all the moral exhortations of the law. That leaves us all behind. One of my commentators preaches that “Obedience is the true measure of a person’s faith.”[1] If this is so, I think we’ll all be lost in the end. The Bible makes it clear that there is no human who is without sin. Further, the apostle John tells us in his first letter that anyone who says he is without sin is a liar. One current commentator has made a name for himself for saying and expounding on saying, “If Jesus is not Lord of all, He is not Lord at all.” The point in this is that if a person wants to be saved, Jesus must be the Lord of everything in his life. One person listening to a preacher proclaim this view watched the teacher who recognized his struggles in life in the middle of his teaching and said, “The whole class could tell he was troubled by what was said, even though the teacher didn’t say a word. He then made his feelings clear. He rubbed his stomach and said, that statement makes me sick to my stomach.’”[2] Obedience of “faith” means to believe in Jesus to have paid the penalty for our sins. I agree with Barrett, who said, “It is perhaps better to recognize that there are different kinds of obedience; there is what may be called a ‘works obedience,’ concerned to produce works that may win favor from God, and a ‘faith obedience,’ arising out of the faith that gratefully accepts the favor that God has already spontaneously shown. It is the latter that Paul seeks.”[3]

[1] Mounce, Robert H. 1995. Romans. Vol. 27. The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

[2] Bad Theology Will Make You Sick (Rom 10:9)  – Grace in Focus Blog for 2/27/2023

[3] Barrett, C. K. 1991. The Epistle to the Romans. Rev. ed. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: Continuum.

Acts 1:8, Romans 10:14-15

Good News for the Whole World

Being together with Jesus before his ascension into heaven, the disciples ask Jesus about the future coming of His kingdom on earth. They want to know if He’s going to do that now. In their question was the assumption that it would be the Kingdom of Israel. They might still not have grasped the idea that Jesus’ kingdom would be for the whole world. Jesus informs them that the times and seasons of His kingdom coming is not something in their purview. They should pay attention and focus their efforts on something else. In Acts 1:8, Jesus tells them, “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” You won’t be able to see the future, but you will receive the power you need to concentrate on the mission God is giving you. They were called to spread the message of Jesus Christ right where they were and move from there to the rest of the world.

I’m worried about the understanding and often the preaching of this passage, which makes “power” the same as “might.” Since the days of Constantine, along with many of the following rulers, this has been misunderstood a lot. Boice recognized the danger of misunderstanding what Jesus meant. The problem is that we still struggle with the flesh and are often moved to think we can force the issue. He writes, “It is the temptation to think that we are to do the Lord’s work in the world’s way. We are to establish the kingdom politically—by law, by getting Christians into high positions in government, and by imposing our vision of society on the world.”[1] I’m not arguing that we don’t need good Christian politicians. Boice and I both agree that we do. It’s just that Jesus doesn’t commend us to “Jihad.” To force conversions with a sword. He even told Peter to put away his sword because those who live by it will die by it. If we understand the “last times” accurately, there will be a time when force is used, and all the wicked will stand before the Lord and face the consequences for their behavior. But Jesus does not call Christians to hold others accountable in that way today. He will take care of that when He returns.

The power that Jesus was referring to that was bestowed upon the disciples was not military power to coerce people to the faith, but the ability and understanding of sharing Christ in a way that might convince people of the truth of the faith. The Holy Spirit will instruct them on what to say and when to say it. More importantly, it will place the passion for seeing others come to faith, without which no one will be saved. Paul makes the importance of witnessing the central thing in the salvation of individuals. Pointing to Jesus as the savior of the world is what is done, and the Holy Spirit will apply the power to the preaching. Paul says in Romans 10:14-15, “How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” Acts 1:8 is Jesus “sending” his disciples to tell others the wonderful, good news of having our sins forgiven and being made right with God. I like what Ogilvie says, “There are very few examples in two thousand years of Christian history of people becoming Christians with no direct or indirect influence from witnesses in whom the Savior communicated His love. Surely, many have made their initial commitment to Christ alone with their Bibles. But prior to that was the influence of individuals or the church, however misguided or inept they might have been. Augustine was alone when he gave his life to the pursuing Savior, but his mother, Monica, was praying![2]

[1] Boice, James Montgomery. 1997. Acts: An Expositional Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

[2] Ogilvie, Lloyd J., and Lloyd J. Ogilvie. 1983. Acts. Vol. 28. The Preacher’s Commentary Series. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.

John 1:6-8, various

John Was Just a Voice

After introducing his readers to the reality of the existence and glory of God seen in the light of Christ, John turns his attention to the last Old Testament prophet, John the Baptist. The Gospel writer says in John 1:6-8, “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness, to bear witness about the light that all might believe through him.  He was not the light but came to bear witness about the light.” A web blogger talked about John the Baptist and said, “Most everyone, believer and non-believer alike, has heard of John the Baptist. He is one of the most significant and well-known figures in the Bible. While John was known as ‘the Baptist,’ he was the first prophet called by God since Malachi some 400 years earlier. John’s coming was foretold over 700 years previously by another prophet….”[1] That other prophet was Isaiah. The passage being referred to is Isaiah 40:3-5. It says, “A voice cries: ‘In the wilderness prepare the way of the Lord; make straight in the desert a highway for our God.  Every valley shall be lifted, and every mountain and hill be made low; the uneven ground shall become level, and the rough places a plain. And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together, for the mouth of the Lord has spoken.’”

John’s prophetic mission was to shine the light “on the light of the world.” God presented Himself to the world in the person of His Son, Jesus. He was made flesh, and everyone could see him. He was the light! He cleared up things. He made, and makes, sense out of everything. John was not the light, as we’ll read later in this, the fourth gospel. “Seeing” John was not important. Boice says, “Certainly, John was a charismatic figure. We read that droves of people went out to him, much as they later did to hear the Lord Jesus Christ. This following was so substantial that it even disturbed the priests and Levites in Jerusalem, who sent delegates to investigate John’s teaching.”[2] John was not the light, he was the “sound.” Quoting the prophecy concerning him, John the Baptist said that he was just a voice crying out in the wilderness. John insisted on growing less and less significant as Christ grew more and more significant. John had some extraordinary humility. He often denied being anyone of importance but simply wanted to point the way to the “Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world.” Jesus was the point of John’s ministry.

Psalm 1 tells us about the “one” who lives the perfect life. The Psalmist lists all the wonderful traits this person will manifest. He doesn’t listen to wicked advice. He’s not a scoffer. He delights in the law of the Lord. He doesn’t participate in the popular sins of the day. Other things are also associated with the “one” praised in the first Psalm. The only perfect person in this scenario is the Lord Jesus, Himself. We are all sinners and have fallen short of God’s standards. But Jesus didn’t. This is why we all need a savior. The one that John pointed to. The preaching of Psalm 1 focuses primarily on trying to live up to the standard presented there. I don’t think any mere human could do it. It seems more relevant to point out from that Psalm how far we fall short and how Jesus lived up to that standard for us. Jesus is “The One.” Jesus taught us that “the one” who humbles himself will be exalted. John certainly did humble himself. He wasn’t the light. He wasn’t the prophet. He was just a voice. Yet, when Jesus was questioned about John, he said, “Among those born of a woman, there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist, yet he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than John.”

[1] https://www.gotquestions.org/life-John-Baptist.html

[2] Boice, James Montgomery. 2005. The Gospel of John: An Expositional Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

Luke 1:10-11, Various

The Hour of Incense

Zachariah was chosen by lot to be the one priest to enter the holy place to burn the annual incense as God had directed in the Bible. While he interceded for his people, they would be in prayer for him. It’s been said that when the high priest would enter the holy of holies, they would tie a rope to his ankle in case God would be displeased with his offering and kill him.  His robes also had bells on the bottom so that the people outside could hear him walking around. If the bells became silent, they would know something had happened to him. They would be able to pull him out without anyone else having to enter the vengeful presence of God. I’m unsure if this was true or if it applied to Zachariah on this occasion, but the deed seems very solemn. He would enter into the presence of God to bring an offering, and the people would be praying that it would be acceptable. You never know what might happen when you enter God’s presence. Luke 1:10-11 tells us what happened to Zachariah, “And the whole multitude of the people were praying outside at the hour of incense. And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense.”

 The phrase “angel of the lord” is often used in the Old Testament to refer to the pre-incarnate appearance of Jesus. One blogger argues that this designation for Christ ended with the incarnation.  He says, “The appearances of the angel of the Lord cease after the incarnation of Christ.”[1] It makes sense to me. Once Jesus appears in the flesh, there is no need for the supernatural manifestation of Him as an angel. Besides, we know from a latter verse in the first chapter of Luke that this angel identifies himself as “Gabriel.” It seems Gabriel had a special role in the prophetic announcement of the coming of the Savior. The dark era of silence from God since the prophet Malachi ended the Old Testament with his prophecy of the coming of a forerunner in the power of Elijah was coming to an end. So, Gooding says, “And so in the last few months before sunrise, the angel Gabriel was sent to tell Zechariah that he and his wife were soon to have a child.”[2]

Gabriel is well known as the angel with the trumpet. When Jesus comes again, His arrival will be announced by the “sound of the trumpet” according to 1 Thessalonians 4:16, “For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.” Since Gabriel is one of only three Archangels mentioned in the Bible, the trumpet has become known as “Gabriel’s Trumpet.” But many argue that the Bible does not identify Gabriel as the blower of the trumpet. It’s just the sound of the trumpet that ushers in the last days. According to another ancient text (not canonical), the Gospel of Laodice, the Lord instructed Gabriel to leave his trumpet on earth when returning to heaven. We don’t know why, but many speculators suggest that God wanted the second coming of the Lord to be heralded by mortals.[3] The search for Gabriel’s Trumpet would make another great Indiana Jones movie, don’t you think?

Intercessory prayer was of significant note here. We see the citizens praying for Zechariah, and we see his standing next to the altar of incense. This altar has often been recognized as symbolic of the prayers of the saints. In Revelation 8:3, John’s vision explains the smoke and incense as the sweet-smelling savor of intercessory prayer. Osborne summarizes this verse, “The right side signifies God’s favor, and it is fitting that God’s temple is the place where the events are set in motion that will end with the births of the messianic forerunner and the Messiah himself.”[4]

[1] Got Questions Ministries. 2002–2013. Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[2] Gooding, David. 2013. According to Luke: The Third Gospel’s Ordered Historical Narrative. Myrtlefield Expositions. Coleraine, Northern Ireland: Myrtlefield House.

[3] https://whitewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Gabriel%27s_Trumpet

[4] Osborne, Grant R. 2018. Luke: Verse by Verse. Edited by Jeffrey Reimer, Elliot Ritzema, and Danielle Thevenaz, Awa Sarah. Osborne New Testament Commentaries. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.

Mark 1:5

Down to the River!

One of my favorite songs from “Oh Brother, Where art thou?” was sung by Alison Krauss. You’ve heard it. Here are some of the lyrics,

As I went down in the river to pray
Studying about that good ol’ way
And who shall wear the starry crown?
Good Lord show me the way

 O sinners, let’s go down
Let’s go down, come on down
O sinners, let’s go down
Down in the river to pray.

As I read the fifth verse of Mark’s Gospel, chapter 1, I had to think of that song. It says, “And all the country of Judea and all Jerusalem were going out to him and were being baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.” There was a great spiritual revival. It was in anticipation of what was to come. John, the baptizer, was the one to come as a forerunner of the Messiah, as the Prophets foretold. During my five tours to Israel, I ensured our groups had the opportunity to be baptized in the Jordan River. That was always one of the highlights of the tour. It was an exciting time and was seen as an exercise of renewal. Everyone on tour had already been baptized, but this was symbolic. The cry in and around all of Judea and its capital city, Jerusalem, was the last verse of that song, “O Sinners, let’s go down!” John preached a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins according to Mark 1:3. Baptism is a public proclamation of one’s sinfulness. That’s called confession. Calvin saw this act as the natural outcome of conviction of sin and the outward expression of that at a public baptism. It affects the whole community when it happens. He writes, “But when the mind is effected as it ought, it cannot but give vent to itself in external manifestation, especially when it tends to the common edification, that all, by openly confessing their sin, may render praise to the divine justice, and by their example mutually encourage each other.”[1]

In the history of America, we will find two periods in which “revival” was prominent. Those periods are called “awakenings.”  One blogger says, “They came from God and were sent to wake up a people to their spiritual condition bringing about great conviction of sin and widespread repentance. So, we have the First Great Awakening and the Second Great Awakening in America. They did not come because the Christians had all repented and brought on the Awakening. On the contrary, the Awakenings came as a surprise and brought repentance with it. Iain Murray writes, ‘The sheer unexpectedness of such events bears equally against the view that revivals are conditioned by the preceding actions and efforts of Christians. Those who believe that a certain line of conduct or prayer must secure revival have history against them. Revivals come unheralded. They are, as Edwards witnessed in Northampton in 1735, the surprising work of God’. Of the Great Awakening of 1740, it is said that ‘it broke upon the slumbering churches like a thunderbolt rushing out of a clear sky.’”[2] This is radically different from the “woke” culture of today. It refers to social awareness of current situations. It looks at perceived injustices committed against you, not the injustices you may have committed against God and others. Wokeness calls for action! That action is often very violent. Spiritual awakenings deal with the awareness of one’s own sinfulness and the need for forgiveness.

[1] Calvin, John. 1997. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[2] https://www.oneplace.com/ministries/watchman-radio-hour/read/articles/which-comes-first-repentance-or-revival-11815.html

Matthew 1:19, Various

Mercy for Sinners!

The virgin birth is a doctrine that is not fully accepted within Christian circles today. The liberal wings of various denominations do not see it as an important doctrine. It’s not hard to understand this because it’s something that must be taken by faith. It’s certainly nothing we would be able to verify scientifically, and all experiences in our lives speak against it. Matthew reminds us in Matthew 1:19 that even Joseph had trouble with it. It says, “And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly.” Joseph is called a “just” man.  It seems that to Joseph, “mercy” had to be involved with Justice. Leon Morris says, “Joseph, being just, saw that he was unable to consummate the marriage, but he did not want to be harsh. Perhaps we should say that Joseph being just before God included an element of mercy.”[1]  Augustine, in the 4th Century, had an interesting take on this passage. He writes, “If you alone have knowledge of a sin that any has committed against you, and desire to accuse him thereof before men, you do not herein correct, but rather betray him. But Joseph, being a just man with great mercy, spared his wife in this great crime of which he suspected her. The seeming certainty of her unchastity tormented him, and yet because he alone knew of it, he was willing not to publish it but to send her away privily, seeking rather the benefit than the punishment of the sinner.”[2]

The idea of being “a just man” in Israel during Christ’s day meant that Joseph, although not describing him as perfect, he was an observant Jew. Morgan writes, “He was not only morally upright; he was a man who kept the law of God. But it also meant that he had respect and awe for God’s plan of salvation. We see that in his dealing with Mary. He was not prepared to subject her to any public ridicule. Much less was he prepared to see her possibly tried and stoned for ‘adultery.’ Joseph was a man who was open to the things of God. Indeed, there is one school of thought that has Joseph belonging to a Jewish group called the ‘Anwim’ or ‘poor ones,’ men and women who were devout and committed to living a life of holiness and obedience to the law; Mary, Elizabeth, and Zechariah were thought to be a part of the Anwim as well.”[3]

I can’t help but believe that Joseph had feelings for Mary. He doesn’t want to hurt her. The religious leaders that Christ faced throughout his stay on earth had no such feelings for the woman caught in adultery. They drug her into the public square to shame her. Joseph wasn’t at all like the sect of the Pharisees. Usually, those who live up to their own codes of conduct are often very critical and condemning of others who fail. But Joseph has strict behavior standards for himself and yet is compassionate towards others. Yet, there was no way he could maintain his standards and continue his engagement with Mary. Thus, his intention was to break it off, even though it would cost him personally. It’s often said that Jesus loved the sinners but hated the sin. Like Father like Son doesn’t apply to Jesus and Joseph in the literal sense. Yet, Jesus’ actions towards the adulterer who met with public disgrace at the hands of the religious leaders must have pleased his earthly father.  Micah tells us that God wants three things from us: To live justly (have a strong code of ethical standards), to love mercy (be gracious to sinners), and to walk humbly with your God.

[1] Morris, Leon. 1992. The Gospel according to Matthew. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press.

[2] Thomas Aquinas. 1841. Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels, Collected out of the Works of the Fathers: St. Matthew. Edited by John Henry Newman. Vol. 1. Oxford: John Henry Parker.

[3] Morgan, Robert J. 2007. Nelson’s Annual Preacher’s Sourcebook. 2007 Edition. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

sewa motor jogja
© Chuck Larsen 2019. Powered by WordPress.